Let's talk about your next study New study? Request a quote →
Loading...
HIV-1 IPDA® Services
standard & ultrasensitive hiv-1 rna measurement

HIV-1 Plasma Viral Load Testing

One automated platform. Two levels of sensitivity.

Measure HIV-1 plasma RNA at the level your study requires—from clinical monitoring and protocol-defined rebound to residual viremia below the standard reporting range.

Overview

Upon initiation of effective antiretroviral therapy (ART), plasma viral load declines in distinct phases: rapid decay of circulating virus, decay of productively infected CD4+ T lymphoblasts, and decay of chronically infected cells, at which point plasma viral load becomes undetectable by standard clinical assays. For routine monitoring of people with HIV (PWH) on ART, standard clinical assays are sufficient to confirm stable suppression of viral replication.

Assays capable of detecting single copies of residual plasma HIV-1 RNA revealed a fourth phase: viremia persists in most PWH despite effective ART, with a half-life on the order of a decade. The source is likely long-lived cells that continually or intermittently express virus, which in most PWH does not result in ongoing rounds of replication. While residual viremia is not a direct measure of latent reservoir size, its level likely reflects the number of persistently infected cells and the transcriptional and translational state of the proviruses they carry. Many translational studies and clinical trials therefore track residual viremia over time to understand latent reservoir dynamics or evaluate novel therapeutics targeting latent HIV-1.

Accelevir offers both levels of sensitivity on the same automated platform in our CAP-accredited, CLIA-certified laboratory in Baltimore, Maryland, under an externally audited, company-wide quality management system. A study can move between the two levels without introducing a platform change into its dataset.

Two Levels of Sensitivity
Standard clinical HIV-1 viral load using the Hologic Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx assay, plus ultrasensitive plasma viral load using the 9-replicate Aptima approach.

Clinical monitoring + residual viremia

Clinical Viral Load

Standard Clinical HIV-1 Viral Load

The Hologic Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx assay is an automated IVD viral load test with validated performance across HIV-1 subtypes, targeting two regions of the viral genome.

We perform this clinical test on the Hologic Panther system under our HHS certificate of CLIA accreditation for high-complexity molecular testing, using Accelevir standard operating procedures and manufacturer controls.

This is the appropriate test for participant eligibility screening, routine on-study monitoring, confirmation of virologic suppression, protocol-defined rebound detection during treatment interruption, and any endpoint requiring a clinical-grade result.

Sample specification: See the manufacturer’s instructions for use for detailed specifications.

Standard clinical testing supports eligibility, on-study monitoring, suppression confirmation, and protocol-defined rebound detection.
Residual Viremia

Ultrasensitive HIV-1 Plasma Viral Load

The automated 9-replicate Aptima approach brings ultrasensitive plasma HIV-1 RNA measurement onto a standardized commercial platform with the throughput needed for clinical trial sample sets.
Nine replicate measurements are interpreted by Poisson modeling of positive and negative results.

01

Limitations of Earlier Ultrasensitive Assays

The original single-copy plasma HIV-1 RNA assay was developed by investigators at the NCI HIV Drug Resistance Program, with iterative improvements to address HIV sequence diversity within subtype B viruses circulating in the United States. Although important to cure research, early iterations were complex, required ultracentrifugation, offered limited throughput and constrained sensitivity, demanded strict process control to minimize false positives, and proved difficult to standardize across laboratories.

02

The Automated Multi-Replicate Approach

Development by the Mellors laboratory at the University of Pittsburgh and the Busch laboratory at Vitalant Research Institute addressed these limitations. Rather than concentrating virus from a large plasma volume, the assay performs nine replicate HIV-1 plasma viral load measurements on the Hologic Panther system using the Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx IVD test. Concentration is derived by Poisson modeling of the pattern of positive and negative replicates.

03

Independent RAVEN Evaluation

Under the Reservoir Assay Validation and Evaluation Network (RAVEN), Accelevir was one of three independent laboratories testing blinded panels of clinical plasma from ART-suppressed PWH, serially diluted analytic standards, and HIV-negative controls. Compared directly with manual ultracentrifugation-based single-copy assays, the automated assay performed comparably across laboratories and detected HIV-1 RNA in a higher proportion of samples from virally suppressed participants. Accelevir reports these findings as a co-author on the resulting publication.

04

Analytical Qualification

Using a blinded panel of clinical plasma samples from PWH, analytically diluted standards, and negative controls developed by RAVEN and provided by the NIAID Virology Quality Assurance Program at Duke University, Accelevir demonstrated accurate, precise, and reproducible performance. The assay is offered as an analytically qualified service, and a qualification report is provided to groups conducting clinical trials on request. Sample specification: 5 to 6 mL of frozen plasma stored at or below -80°C.
Study Design Advantages

Three Properties That
Shape Study Design

Throughput

Because measurement runs on an automated commercial platform rather than through a multi-step manual workflow, throughput is sufficient for full clinical trial sample sets with predictable turnaround. Manual ultracentrifugation-based assays constrain the number of timepoints a study can practically measure—and therefore constrain study design.

Cross-Laboratory Reproducibility

Because the underlying test and platform are standardized rather than laboratory-developed, results generated at one site can be interpreted against results generated elsewhere by the same method. For multi-site trials and consortium studies, this is the difference between a poolable dataset and a collection of site-specific ones.

Cross-Subtype Performance

The Aptima test targets two regions of the viral genome and has validated performance across subtypes, avoiding primer-mismatch problems that have affected some single-copy assays on non-B virus. For trials enrolling outside the US and western Europe, this determines whether an ultrasensitive endpoint is usable at all.

One Platform Across Sensitivity Levels

Standard and ultrasensitive testing are performed in one laboratory on the same automated platform, allowing a study to move between sensitivity levels without introducing a platform change into its dataset.
Assay Selection

Select the Appropriate Level of Sensitivity

Many studies employ both. Standard testing establishes and confirms suppression and detects protocol-defined rebound, while the ultrasensitive assay resolves what is occurring beneath the clinical threshold at defined study timepoints. Performing both in one laboratory on the same platform removes a source of cross-assay variability that is otherwise difficult to account for in analysis.

Standard clinical viral load
Ultrasensitive 9-replicate assay
Regulatory status
Standard clinical viral load
Run as a CLIA test
Ultrasensitive 9-replicate assay
Assay service, analytically qualified
Typical application
Standard clinical viral load
Eligibility, on-study monitoring, protocol-defined rebound
Ultrasensitive 9-replicate assay
Residual viremia below the clinical reporting range
Plasma volume
Standard clinical viral load
Per manufacturer IFU
Ultrasensitive 9-replicate assay
5 to 6 mL
Best suited to
Standard clinical viral load
Any endpoint requiring a clinical-grade result
Ultrasensitive 9-replicate assay
Pre-interruption stratification, intervention effect on residual virus, long-term suppression and remission cohorts
Integrated Study Planning

Match sensitivity to the question at each timepoint

A coordinated testing plan can use standard viral load to define suppression and rebound while reserving ultrasensitive measurement for the study timepoints where residual viremia carries the most scientific value.

Applications

Plasma Viral Load Across HIV Research Programs

Standard and ultrasensitive plasma HIV-1 RNA measurements support distinct but complementary questions across clinical and translational research.

01

Analytical Treatment Interruption Studies

Residual viremia measured before interruption is among the better-characterized correlates of rebound timing, particularly in early-treated individuals. A transition to undetectable residual viremia following therapeutic intervention may help identify individuals more likely to experience delayed rebound. Standard clinical viral load then defines rebound against the protocol threshold.

02

Latency Reversal Trials

Effective latency reversal is expected to produce a transient increase in plasma HIV-1 RNA. For most single agents evaluated to date, any increase falls at or below the detection limit of standard clinical assays, which is part of why the clinical trial record has been difficult to interpret. An ultrasensitive endpoint can resolve the effect.

03

Treatment Intensification & Novel Regimens

Where the question is whether an intensified or novel regimen reduces ongoing virion production below what current ART achieves, residual viremia is the endpoint. Standard clinical viral load cannot address it because both arms are undetectable.

04

Broadly Neutralizing Antibody & Therapeutic Vaccine Programs

Longitudinal residual viremia can be measured alongside reservoir size in participants who remain clinically suppressed throughout the study.

05

Post-Treatment Control & Remission Cohorts

Ultrasensitive testing supports characterization of elite controllers, post-treatment controllers, and participants in extended remission, in whom the clinically relevant differences fall below the standard reporting range.

06

Prevention Studies

Ultrasensitive assays have been applied to characterize low-level viremia in breakthrough infections identified in PrEP trials, where standard clinical testing can be ambiguous.

Interpretation Considerations

What Residual Viremia Does—and Does Not—Measure

It is not established whether most residual viremia on ART consists of infectious virus, although in at least some individuals the majority of residual virus has been shown to be infectious.
Residual viremia should therefore be understood as a measure of ongoing virion production rather than as direct evidence of an infectious, replication-competent circulating population.

Higher residual viremia measured before treatment interruption has been associated with faster time to rebound in several cohorts, with the strength of that association varying by timing of ART initiation. When considered together with IPDA® quantification of intact proviruses and sensitive measurements of cell-associated HIV-1 RNA, residual viremia is an important data point for understanding or predicting viral rebound dynamics.

Residual viremia is most informative when interpreted alongside intact proviral DNA and cell-associated RNA.
Complementary Measures of HIV-1 Persistence

Interpret Residual Viremia in Reservoir Context

Persistent HIV-1 is a comprehensive term encompassing all forms of integrated proviral DNA that persist for years despite ART. The landscape of persistent proviruses in each infected individual is both diverse and dynamic, and it can be differentiated by genomic fidelity, the ability to be expressed and replicate, and transcriptional state.

Because no single measurement resolves all these dimensions, quantifying changes across several of them is central to HIV cure research and clinical development. Residual viremia is most informative alongside cell-associated RNA and intact proviral DNA, which together help distinguish a reservoir that has become smaller from one that has become less transcriptionally active.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Study-specific planning aligns sensitivity, plasma volume, timepoints, and complementary persistence measurements.
What is an HIV-1 single-copy assay?

A single-copy assay is an ultrasensitive method for quantifying HIV-1 RNA in plasma at concentrations below the reporting range of standard clinical viral load tests. These assays are used to measure residual viremia in PWH on suppressive ART, in whom clinical tests report virus as not detected.

How does the 9-replicate approach differ from earlier single-copy assays?

Earlier assays concentrate virus from a large plasma volume by ultracentrifugation before amplification. The 9-replicate approach instead performs nine independent replicate measurements of the same specimen on an automated platform, deriving concentration by Poisson modeling of positive and negative replicates. It is automated, offers higher throughput, and reproduces more consistently across performing laboratories.

What is the sensitivity of the ultrasensitive assay?

Performance characteristics were established through our analytical qualification, and a qualification report is provided to groups conducting clinical trials on request. We prefer to discuss specific figures in the context of a study design, since the sensitivity that matters in practice depends on input volume and how the result will be used.

Is your viral load testing CLIA?


Standard clinical viral load using the Hologic Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx assay is run as a CLIA test under our HHS certificate of CLIA accreditation. The ultrasensitive 9-replicate assay is offered as an analytically qualified assay service to support research and clinical trials.

How much plasma is required for the ultrasensitive assay?

5 to 6 mL of plasma, frozen and stored at or below -80°C. For standard clinical viral load, see the manufacturer’s instructions for use.

Does residual viremia predict viral rebound?

Higher residual plasma viremia measured before treatment interruption has been associated with faster time to rebound in several cohorts, with the strength of the association varying by timing of ART initiation. It is best treated as one input among several, since no single virologic biomarker reliably predicts rebound or remission at the individual level.

Can samples from participants with non-B subtype infection be tested?

Yes. The underlying Aptima test targets two regions of the viral genome and has validated cross-subtype performance, which was among our reasons for selecting it.

Can plasma and cell-based measurements be run on the same participants?

Yes. Plasma and cell-based assays are performed in one laboratory under a single quality system, which means one shipping arrangement, one project manager, and one integrated report.

Scientific References

Methods and Supporting Evidence

Automated ultrasensitive assay evaluation

Coco SB, Stone M, Deng X, et al. Comparison of manual and automated ultrasensitive assays for residual HIV-1 in plasma from individuals on suppressive antiretroviral therapy. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2025;63(12):e00995-25.

Hologic Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx assay

Manufacturer information and instructions for use for the Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx assay.

Working With Accelevir

Plan the Right Viral Load Strategy for Your Study

We provide assay services to NIH-funded clinical trials networks, multi-university research collaborations, pharmaceutical and biotechnology sponsors, and individual research laboratories. Our assay services have supported dozens of interventional clinical trials for HIV-1 remission and cure, and testing can be performed scientifically independently and blinded to study design and treatment outcomes. Engagements begin with endpoints, sample types, collection and shipping requirements, timelines, and reporting format—ideally before the collection protocol is finalized.
What we'll cover

Scientific consultation

Baltimore, Maryland · CAP/CLIA-certified laboratory · One quality system

Accelevir | © 2026